Friday, May 30, 2008

Fay Vincent - The Last 'REAL' Commissioner


Belated Birthday Greetings to Fay Vincent - I'd meant to have this out yesterday in time for your 70th birthday but I didn't get to it in time.

If the name doesn't ring a bell for you, Fay Vincent was the Commissioner of Baseball for a brief time from September 1989 to September of 1992. He was supposed to fill out the term of Bart Giamatti, the Commissioner that preceded him and died suddenly after appointing Vincent to the newly created deputy commissioner post.

Commissioner Vincent got off to a rocky start - perhaps an omen of things to come - when he presided over the Giants/Athletics World Series game that was interupted by an earthquake. That major earthquake was minor compared to baseball events beginning the following year.

The next spring, the owners staged a lockout of spring training, requiring Vincent to intercede between the Players Union and the owners. He was able to get an agreement reached and baseball started, but late.

A few months later, he had to butt heads with baseball's all time butt-head, George Steinbrenner. Steinbrenner had reneged on a contract with outfielder Dave Winfield and Winfield had the gall to sue Steinbrenner. In retaliation, Steinbrenner paid a local gambler to try to dig up something Steinbrenner could use to blackmail Winfield and Commissioner Vincent promptly banned Steinbrenner from baseball for life. Steinbrenner than had to run the Yankees from behind the scenes while plotting Vincent's ovethrow. This move scared the owners as they had thought they were above the rules that everyone else had to adhere to.

Next Vincent made the mistake of banning Steve Howe from baseball for life for his repeated and mulitple involvement with drugs. Howe, by then a Yankee, had been released from several teams because of his drug problem. He'd been given chance after chance, been in and out of rehab programs, and couldn't get a handle on it. Commissioner Vincent drew a line in the sand, letting the players know that drugs would not be tolerated in baseball. That move incised the players union as well as the owners who both chose to turn a blind eye to the drug problem.

However Commissioner Vincent's biggest mistake, the one that got him a vote of 'no confidence' from the owners, was ruling in favor of the game of baseball. At every opportunity, Fay Vincent, a man of character and integrity, did what he thought was right for the game and nothing else. He didn't side with the players unless he thought they were right. More important, at least to his future, he didn't side with the owners either, every one of which considered himself to be Vincent's boss and Vincent to be a disrepectful employee.

When Vincent resigned in September 1992, instead of appointing his deputy, another true baseball man, the owners instead picked one of their own as a 'temporary' commissioner while they went though the motions of finding a replacement.

Sixteen years later, 'Bumbling' Bud Selig, the 'temporary' commissioner is still there. As to George Steinbrenner and Steve Howe? Reinstated by Bumbling Bud. And the drug problem? Read the paper. You didn't really think the owners were going to turn their million dollar studs out to pasture before they'd gotten every dimes worth from them did you?

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Salute to Tommy John

Never before to my knowledge has a ball player and a medical procedure become synonymous. In fact, Tommy John has become better known for the UCL reconstruction done on his left arm than for what he did with that left arm both before and after his surgery.

He began his Major League career with the Cleveland Indians in 1963, and then with the White Sox. However he is most remembered for his years with the Dodgers. beginning in 1972. His 1974 season, with a record of 13-3, came to a halt when he damaged the ulnar collateral ligament in his left arm. Dr. Frank Jobe, the Dodgers team physician, devised a procedure using a tendon from John's right arm to repair the damaged ligament in his left. Tommy John returned to pitching at the Major League level in 1976 and continued to play until 1989.

The procedure that Dr. Jobe pioneered was so successful that over 100 Major League players have since had 'Tommy John' surgery. However the notoriety that came with having his name associated with the surgical procedure has overshadowed one of the better pitching careers in baseball. A four time All-Star, John ranks high on many of the career stats and often lead the league or was in the top ten in many important categories.

Even more important, today is his 65th birthday. Happy Birthday Tommy John!

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Nutrition for Active Boomers and Beyond

I didn't realize it was so hard to find anyone that was an authority on nutrition for ACTIVE seniors. There are a ton of places to find information on special diets for older citizens but they're all based on coping with some ailment or other.

If you're not familiar with Blog Talk Radio, I have a weekly radio show talking about Senior Sports one week and Senior Fitness the next. I've been trying to find a guest for this coming Friday to talk about nutrition for the active senior and have drawn a blank. There are all sorts of special diets and suggestions to deal with high blood pressure and obesity. I could fill a room with all the people that can tell you about dealing with Type II Diabetes and how to use the Glycemic index. Same for experts on sports nutrition for the younger athlete. But when it comes to the people like myself, that are boomers and beyond and in decent health and active, asking for advice regarding nutrition gets a shrug and advice like, "I guess you keep eating what's kept you healthy so far."

While that does make some sense in a, "If it's not broke, don't fix it," sort of way, I for one don't like any answer that starts with, "I guess . . ." If all we're going to do is guess, I don't need help with that. So what I'm going to have to do is ad lib it. I'll present excerpts from various books and publications and hopefully that will be of help to some of my audience.

The conclusion I reached is based on the current working order of our medical system, which is pretty much the same as, "If it's not broke, don't fix it." The reason it's so hard to find someone with a knowledge of the special needs of senior athletes is that active seniors don't have enough health issues to make them a viable interest to the medical profession. Active seniors don't have enough problems to make them a source of income and the medical profession is geared toward resolving problems after the fact - not prevention from the standpoint of nutrition. The nutritional problems of the aging citizen are almost always brought on by some combination of inactivity and depression.

If you'd like to listen in, please do:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Woodbat/2008/05/24/The-Senior-Fitness-Show

In the meantime, I'll keep trying to find an 'expert' that can give us a little more authoritive view. And if you know of anyone, please have them contact me!

Monday, April 21, 2008

Sprint - or, How can a Company be so Bad?

I'm one of the many that got shafted when our Nextel accounts were taken over by Sprint. Considering what I'd previously learned about Sprint, I had reservations about the outcome of that deal. Not only did my fears prove to be justified, I wish we could find a lawyer willing to take a class action suit against Sprint to get us out of our contracts. And if we could get some kind of judgement for the trials, tribulations, and plain old pain-in-the-ass that dealing with Sprint has caused us, that would be nice too!



I have never in my 65 years run across another company that works so hard to piss off its customers. I do not know of a single Sprint customer that has not had some sort of convoluted, time consuming experience dealing with what Sprint mistakingly considers, "Customer Service." All, like myself, are biding our time for our contracts to run out so that we may switch to another company without penalty.



EVERY month this year and a couple of times last year, when I try to pay my bill on-line, there is some problem with the web site that keeps me from doing that. Then when I call to resolve the issue, the PIN that worked the last time I talked to them (the previous month) is no longer working. This is the fourth month of the year, and the fourth time in a row that I've had the same or similar problems with Sprint.



One of the many questions I'd like to know is, who are the band of idiots running that company? Those of us that came over from Nextel were never treated like this prior to Sprint's intervention. It's my understanding from talking to older Sprint customers that they NEVER had a decent customer service organization, while Nextel was getting Kudos for theirs. So why, after spending so much to acquire Nextel, didn't Sprint put the Nextel people and policies into place?

But no, they couldn't think that far ahead. Instead of bringing Sprint up to Nextel's level, they drug Nextel down to theirs.



Why, with so many needs elsewhere in the company, did Sprint spend millions arguing with ATT over a freaking race car logo? While an arguement could be made that the logo could influence the buying decision of a handful of rednecks that aren't currently cell phone users; at exactly the same time Sprint is encouraging existing customers to leave and those ex-customers will be having hundreds of times more negative impact than a hood decoration ever did. Maybe someone in upper management at Sprint should take a good hard look at the basics.



Sprint is supposed to be providing Mobile Phone Service. Sprint seems to understand 'Moble' and 'Phone' okay, but 'Service' to Sprint seems to be a four-letter word. In fact, considering the inteligence I've seen demonstrated by Sprint management, maybe they do spell it with four letters. And if that's the case, I can easily understand why the letters of complaint to Sprint get form letters in reply and are never read or have the issues addressed by managment. It's quite possible that Sprint management can't read OR write.



I don't own any Sprint stock and if I did, I'd sell it. I can't see any hope of improvement on the course this company is taking.